The Vietnam ETF market closed the 27/10/2026 session with total HOSE-listed ETF assets standing at 23.01T VND across 24 funds, as the VN-Index finished at 1,761.87 pts (-0.10%) and the VN30-Index at 1,888.40 pts (-0.06%). Breadth within the ETF wrapper was mildly negative — 6 advancers, 10 decliners and 8 unchanged — while aggregate HOSE ETF trading value reached 10.36B VND. According to HOSE / VCI order-book data on etf.com.vn, foreign investors bought 8.22B VND and sold 3.19B VND on the secondary market, producing a net inflow of +5.03B VND. Full venue-by-venue coverage is available on the Vietnam market dashboard, with product specifications on the ETF product page.
Key Takeaways
- Foreign flow was positive at the aggregate level: HOSE ETF foreign investors net bought +5.03B VND (buy 8.22B / sell 3.19B), but the entire surplus was carried by FUEVFVND at +5.70B VND, with E1VFVN30 (-0.59B VND) and FUEVN100 (-0.33B VND) offsetting.
- Closing-price dislocation versus VWAP was material in small-cap funds: FUEDCMID closed +1.72% at 11,800 VND, or +2.40% above its 11,524 VND intraday VWAP, while FUESSV50 closed -2.27% at 27,940 VND, -0.56% below its 28,097 VND VWAP.
- Liquidity stayed concentrated in the two flagship funds: E1VFVN30 (142,400 units) and FUEVFVND (114,300 units) accounted for the bulk of the 10.36B VND HOSE ETF turnover, while nine funds traded fewer than 4,000 units.
Benchmark Context: A Flat Tape With a Narrow Intraday Range
Index-level wrap
The VN-Index traded a 13.51-point range (high 1,772.62 / low 1,759.11) and settled 0.10% lower, while the VN30-Index ranged between 1,898.77 and 1,883.46 before closing at 1,888.40. That is a compression pattern rather than a directional one: the large-cap benchmark marginally outperformed the broad index by 4 basis points, which explains why VN30-tracking ETFs were the most resilient cohort on the day. E1VFVN30 closed unchanged at 34,000 VND, FUESSV30 added +0.04% to 24,000 VND and FUEMAV30 gained +0.04% to 23,400 VND.
Price versus Intraday VWAP: who closed rich, who closed cheap
Closing-price quality matters for institutional execution. E1VFVN30 finished +0.27% above its 33,907 VND VWAP despite a flat 1-day return, indicating late-session demand into the close. By contrast, FUEVFVND closed at 32,280 VND, -0.25% below its 32,362 VND VWAP, consistent with the -0.98% daily decline in the Diamond basket. The largest positive dislocation came from FUEDCMID (+2.40% versus VWAP), a fund with 281B VND in AUM and only 1,600 units traded — a clear case of thin-book pricing rather than fundamental repricing. Compare live premiums and discounts on the ETF comparison tool.
Session ETF Data: Prices, VWAP, Volume, Foreign Flow and AUM
Comparative table — key HOSE-listed ETFs, 27/10/2026
| Ticker | Fund | Close (VND) | 1D | vs Intraday VWAP | Volume (units) | Foreign 1D (B VND) | Foreign 5D (B VND) | AUM (B VND) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUEVFVND | DCVFMVN Diamond ETF | 32,280 | -0.98% | -0.25% | 114,300 | +5.70 | +23.01 | 10,456 |
| E1VFVN30 | DCVFMVN30 ETF | 34,000 | +0.00% | +0.27% | 142,400 | -0.59 | -14.24 | 5,879 |
| FUEKIV30 | KIM Growth VN30 ETF | 12,990 | -0.38% | +0.44% | 1,400 | -0.00 | +0.41 | 2,298 |
| FUEVN100 | VinaCapital VN100 ETF | 24,500 | -0.93% | -0.63% | 24,000 | -0.33 | +2.23 | 691 |
| FUESSVFL | SSIAM VNFIN LEAD ETF | 28,200 | -1.12% | -0.42% | 3,300 | -0.00 | -0.01 | 598 |
| FUEMAV30 | MAFM VN30 ETF | 23,400 | +0.04% | +0.70% | 3,400 | +0.02 | +0.10 | 522 |
| FUEDCMID | DCVFMVNMIDCAP ETF | 11,800 | +1.72% | +2.40% | 1,600 | -0.01 | -0.04 | 281 |
| FUESSV30 | SSIAM VN30 ETF | 24,000 | +0.04% | +0.86% | 16,500 | -0.19 | -0.73 | 257 |
| FUESSV50 | SSIAM VNX50 ETF | 27,940 | -2.27% | -0.56% | 3,200 | -0.06 | -0.15 | 196 |
Source: HOSE / VCI order-book data and Yahoo Finance, session 27/10/2026.
Foreign Flows: Secondary-Market Trades Versus Primary-Market Creation
FUEVFVND absorbed the day's entire net inflow
The +5.03B VND aggregate foreign net buy on HOSE was effectively a single-fund event. FUEVFVND recorded +5.70B VND on the day and +23.01B VND over the trailing five sessions — a persistent accumulation pattern — even as its NAV-proxy basket fell -0.98% and remains -15.72% year-to-date. This is the classic signature of price-insensitive allocators building exposure into weakness rather than momentum chasing.
E1VFVN30's five-day distribution
Conversely, E1VFVN30 saw -0.59B VND on the day and -14.24B VND over five sessions despite closing flat and sitting +2.16% over one week. One important distinction: these figures measure secondary-market foreign net trading value in the order book. They are not primary-market ETF creation/redemption flows, which settle at NAV against the fund issuer and are tracked separately. A negative secondary-market print does not necessarily imply units were redeemed. Screen constituent-level foreign activity via the stock lookup tool.
Basket Composition: Where the Structural Exposure Sits
VN30 versus Diamond versus FinLead
The VN30 wrapper (E1VFVN30, FUESSV30, FUEKIV30, FUEMAV30) is anchored by FPT (12.4%), TCB (9.2%), ACB (8.6%), HPG (8.4%), VPB (7.5%), MBB (7.1%) and MWG (6.2%) — roughly 59% in seven names. The Diamond basket (FUEVFVND, FUEMAVND, FUEKIVND) is materially more concentrated: FPT at 15.1%, PNJ 12.8%, MWG 12.4%, GMD 10.6%, ACB 9.8%, TCB 9.1%, MBB 7.9% and REE 6.8%, which explains the -0.98% / -1.43% declines in FUEVFVND and FUEMAVND on a day when the VN30 wrapper was flat. The FinLead basket (FUESSVFL, FUEKIVFS) is a pure bank-and-broker bet — TCB 14.8%, ACB 14.2%, MBB 13.6%, VPB 12.9%, STB 11.4%, SSI 7.8% — and FUESSVFL duly fell -1.12% while FUEKIVFS bucked the trend at +2.47% on just 100 units.
Positioning implication
With total AUM at 23.01T VND and FUEVFVND alone at 10,456B VND, single-fund concentration risk in the Diamond complex exceeds 45% of the HOSE ETF universe. Build and stress-test allocations on the portfolio builder and review index rules on the ETF asset accumulation tool.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. How much foreign money flowed into Vietnam ETFs on 27/10/2026?
HOSE-listed ETFs recorded +5.03B VND of net foreign buying on the secondary market (buy 8.22B VND, sell 3.19B VND), according to HOSE / VCI order-book data on etf.com.vn. FUEVFVND contributed +5.70B VND, while E1VFVN30 at -0.59B VND and FUEVN100 at -0.33B VND were the main offsets.
2. What was the total AUM of the Vietnam ETF market at the 27/10/2026 close?
Total HOSE ETF AUM stood at 23.01T VND across 24 funds, with aggregate session trading value of 10.36B VND. FUEVFVND (10,456B VND) and E1VFVN30 (5,879B VND) together represent roughly 71% of that total, followed by FUEKIV30 at 2,298B VND.
3. Why did FUEVFVND fall 0.98% while E1VFVN30 closed flat?
Basket composition, not fund mechanics. The VN-Diamond basket carries heavier weights in PNJ (12.8%), GMD (10.6%) and REE (6.8%) alongside a 15.1% FPT position, versus the VN30 basket's more balanced FPT 12.4% / TCB 9.2% / ACB 8.6% / HPG 8.4% mix. On a session where the VN30-Index lost only -0.06% and the VN-Index -0.10%, the Diamond basket's mid-cap tilt underperformed.
Explore the full dataset: live ETF pricing and fund flows on the Vietnam market page, side-by-side fund metrics on the ETF comparison tool, and full product documentation on the ETF product page.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personal investment advice.