Loading live HOSE market data...
ETF Fund Flow
Back to Research & News
ETF Comparison 6 min readOctober 12, 2026🇻🇳 Đọc bản tiếng Việt →

VN30 vs VN Diamond ETFs: Tracking Error, Holding Cost and Fund Flows (October 2026)

Executive Summary

E1VFVN30 sits at 33,840 VND (-6.23% YTD) and FUEVFVND at 32,450 VND (-15.27% YTD) — a 9-point gap, plus what tracking error and fund flows really mean.

By:Sungsoo Na— COO & CCO at teko

VN30 vs VN Diamond ETFs: Tracking Error, Holding Cost and Fund Flows (October 2026)

Tóm tắt: Bài viết này so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond — cụ thể là E1VFVN30 (VFMVN30 ETF) và FUEVFVND (DCVFMVN Diamond ETF) — theo giá, lợi nhuận ngắn hạn, thanh khoản, tracking error, chi phí nắm giữ và dòng tiền quỹ trong tháng 10/2026. Khi so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond, khác biệt lớn nhất hiện tại nằm ở chênh lệch lợi nhuận từ đầu năm (YTD) — khoảng 9 điểm phần trăm.

Vietnam's two most closely followed domestic equity ETFs entered October 2026 with very different year-to-date records. Per Yahoo Finance data as of 9 October 2026, E1VFVN30 (VFMVN30 ETF) was last recorded at 33,840 VND with a -6.23% YTD return, while FUEVFVND (DCVFMVN Diamond ETF) was at 32,450 VND with a -15.27% YTD return — a gap of about 9 percentage points. This article compares the two funds on price, short-term returns and trading volume, then explains what tracking error, holding cost and fund flows actually mean for both.

Session note: Vietnam's market had not yet opened when this data was captured, so every price below reflects the most recent completed session (9 October 2026), not a live intraday quote.

So sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond: snapshot tháng 10/2026

TickerFundLast price1-Day1-Week1-MonthYTDVolume
E1VFVN30VFMVN30 ETF33,840 VND-0.47%-1.02%-4.00%-6.23%461K units
FUEVFVNDDCVFMVN Diamond ETF32,450 VND+0.22%-0.64%-3.99%-15.27%264K units
FUESSV30SSIAM VN30 ETF24,000 VND+0.42%+0.00%-3.42%-5.14%15K units
FUESSV50SSIAM VNX50 ETF27,690 VND+0.65%-1.00%-6.14%-2.57%8K units
FUESSVFLSSIAM VN FINLEAD ETF27,660 VND+1.69%-1.28%-4.59%-8.89%1,211K units
FUEKIVFSKIM Growth VN30 ETF16,210 VND+6.93%-5.20%-5.59%-4.98%0K units
VNMVanEck Vietnam ETF$16.72+0.66%+0.00%-7.11%-12.51%257K shs

Source: Yahoo Finance, data as of 9 October 2026.

Nếu chỉ nhìn vào bảng trên để so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond, điểm đáng chú ý nhất là khoảng cách YTD giữa quỹ dẫn dắt chỉ số VN30 và quỹ theo rổ Diamond, trong khi chênh lệch 1 tháng gần như không đáng kể.

E1VFVN30: 33,840 VND, down 6.23% year to date

The VFMVN30 ETF last changed hands at 33,840 VND, down 0.47% over one day, 1.02% over one week and 4.00% over one month, for a cumulative year-to-date decline of 6.23% on the same data set. It recorded 461K units of volume in the session covered by this snapshot — the second-highest figure among the Vietnam-domiciled funds listed above.

FUEVFVND: 32,450 VND, down 15.27% year to date

The DCVFMVN Diamond ETF was last recorded at 32,450 VND, up 0.22% on the day but down 0.64% over one week, 3.99% over one month and 15.27% year to date. Volume stood at 264K units. The most striking feature here is not the short-term number but the annual one: the Diamond basket has lost more than twice as much as the VN30 flagship on a YTD basis.

Tracking error, chi phí nắm giữ và dòng tiền quỹ khi so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond

Tracking error is a fund-versus-index measure, not a fund-versus-fund measure

Tracking error is the volatility of the difference between a fund's return and the return of the index it is designed to replicate. It is calculated from a time series of NAV returns and index returns, and it is normally published by the fund manager in periodic reports. Nothing in the table above — prices, one-day, one-week, one-month or YTD returns — is a tracking error figure, and none of the numbers here should be relabelled as one.

What the spreads in the table do show

The table does show how differently the products behaved over identical windows. Over the past month, E1VFVN30 returned -4.00% and FUEVFVND returned -3.99% — effectively identical, a spread of 0.01 percentage points. Over the same month, among funds tracking VN30-type baskets, FUESSV30 returned -3.42% and FUEKIVFS returned -5.59%, a spread of 2.17 percentage points.

Những điều cần lưu ý khi so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond

So sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond chỉ có ý nghĩa khi tách bạch ba lớp thông tin: (1) giá và lợi nhuận thị trường, (2) tracking error — sai lệch giữa NAV quỹ và chỉ số cơ sở, và (3) chi phí nắm giữ cùng dòng tiền quỹ. Bảng giá ở trên chỉ phản ánh lớp thứ nhất. Muốn so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond một cách đầy đủ, nhà đầu tư cần đọc báo cáo định kỳ của từng quỹ để lấy số liệu tracking error và tỷ lệ chi phí thực tế.

#VN30 ETF#VN Diamond ETF#ETF comparison#tracking error#E1VFVN30#FUEVFVND

About the Author

Sungsoo Na

COO & CCO at teko

LinkedIn

Financial executive with over 18 years of experience across equity derivatives, structured products, tokenized securities, and fintech in South Korea, Hong Kong, and Vietnam. Former CEO of Vina Securities JSC (2020–2024) and former Institutional Equity Division executive at Morgan Stanley (2014–2019), holding a Ph.D. in Financial Engineering from North Carolina State University.

Full credentials & published research
Disclaimer: This content is provided for informational and market research purposes only and does not constitute personalized investment advice.

Track ETF Flows & Equity Constituents

Monitor live HOSE orderbook prices, VWAP spreads, and check which ETFs hold FPT, ACB, TCB, or HPG.

Related Research Articles