VN30 vs VN Diamond Strategy: Which ETF Leads the Market in July 2026?
As of July 2026, Vietnam's ETF landscape shows a clear divergence between VN30-trackers and the VN Diamond strategy. According to the latest data from 06/07/2026, the DCVFMVN Diamond ETF (FUEVFVND) holds a slightly higher price at 35,970 VND compared to the VFMVN30 ETF (E1VFVN30) at 35,750 VND. However, YTD performance tells a different story: E1VFVN30 is down only 0.94% while FUEVFVND has fallen 6.08%, making the VN30 strategy the relative leader so far in 2026. This so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond article analyzes the two flagship ETFs across key metrics to help investors understand current market dynamics.
Performance Comparison: YTD and Monthly Trends
Year-to-Date Returns
The most striking difference in this so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond is YTD performance. E1VFVN30 has held up relatively well with a YTD decline of just 0.94%, while FUEVFVND has dropped 6.08%. This suggests that the VN30 index components have been more resilient than the VN Diamond index constituents in 2026. The VN Diamond strategy, which focuses on high-dividend stocks, has faced headwinds from sector rotation and dividend cuts.
One-Month Performance
Over the past month, E1VFVN30 gained 2.32%, while FUEVFVND fell 0.22%. This 2.54% gap in favor of the VN30 strategy highlights a short-term momentum advantage. The VN30 ETF also benefits from higher liquidity, with a one-month volume of 411K units compared to FUEVFVND's 639K units, indicating broader investor participation. For a deeper so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond, consider the tracking error metrics below.
Volume and Liquidity Analysis
FUEVFVND recorded a one-day volume of 639K units on 06/07/2026, significantly higher than E1VFVN30's 411K units. This high volume suggests strong retail interest in the VN Diamond strategy, possibly due to its dividend yield focus. However, the price action has been negative for FUEVFVND, with a 1-day decline of 1.56% versus E1VFVN30's 0.67% drop. The higher volume on a down day may indicate selling pressure. This so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond highlights volume dynamics.
Tracking Error and Index Alignment
For VN30 ETFs, tracking error is critical. E1VFVN30 has shown consistent alignment with the VN30 index, with a 1-week decline of 0.33% and a 1-month gain of 2.32%. In contrast, FUEVFVND's 1-week drop of 0.58% and 1-month decline of 0.22% suggest potential tracking deviations. The SSIAM VN30 ETF (FUESSV30) also tracks the VN30 index but with a lower price (25,110 VND) and a 1-month gain of 2.57%, closely mirroring E1VFVN30's performance. This so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond shows index alignment differences.
Broader ETF Market Context
Other notable ETFs in the market include the SSIAM VNX50 ETF (FUESSV50) with a YTD gain of 6.23%, indicating strong performance in the broader VNX50 index. The KIM Growth VN30 ETF (FUEKIVFS) has delivered the highest YTD return of 9.14%, though with very low volume (1K units). The VanEck Vietnam ETF (VNM) shows a YTD decline of 4.71%, reflecting international investor sentiment. For a comprehensive so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond, these broader market factors matter.
FAQ
1. Which ETF has better YTD performance in July 2026?
E1VFVN30 (VFMVN30 ETF) has a YTD return of -0.94%, outperforming FUEVFVND (DCVFMVN Diamond ETF) which is down 6.08%. This so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond clearly favors VN30.
2. Why is FUEVFVND volume higher despite negative performance?
FUEVFVND's higher volume of 639K units on 06/07/2026 may reflect retail investors buying the dip or institutional rebalancing, despite a 1.56% daily decline. This so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond reveals volume dynamics.
3. What is the one-month return difference between VN30 and VN Diamond ETFs?
E1VFVN30 gained 2.32% over one month, while FUEVFVND fell 0.22%, a spread of 2.54% in favor of the VN30 strategy. This so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond highlights short-term momentum.
Explore E1VFVN30 product page | Explore FUEVFVND product page | See SSIAM VN30 ETF | All ETFs | Compare ETFs
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personal investment advice.