Vietnam ETF Comparison 2026: Which ETF Leads YTD and Which Is Least Risky?

So sánh ETF Việt Nam — cập nhật theo giá đóng cửa ngày 16/10/2026. As of the official closing prices on 16 October 2026, every Vietnam ETF in our comparison set is negative year-to-date, and FUESSV50 (SSIAM VNX50 ETF) sits at the top of that table with a YTD figure of -2.53%, based on Yahoo Finance data. The gap to the bottom is wide: FUEVFVND (DCVFMVN Diamond ETF) is the weakest with a YTD return of -14.88%. This comparison walks through price, one-day, one-week, one-month and YTD performance, plus trading volume, to answer two questions readers keep asking in 2026 — which ETF is leading, and which one carries the least risk.

So sánh ETF Việt Nam: full comparison table (closing prices, 16/10/2026)

The market has closed for the session, so all prices below are official closing prices from Yahoo Finance as of 16/10/2026. Every figure in this article comes from that single data set.

Full data set for seven Vietnam ETFs

How to read these columns

Prices for the six domestic funds are quoted in VND per unit; VNM is the US-listed VanEck Vietnam ETF, quoted in USD per share at $16.48. Volume is reported in units for the domestic funds (with VNM in shares), and FUEKIVFS has no volume figure available in this data set — marked "—" — so its trading liquidity cannot be assessed from the table at all. The one-week column for FUEKIVFS is also marked N/A, which means the single-day move for that fund has no confirming multi-session context in this data set. If the instrument itself is new to you, read ETF là gì và cấu trúc của một quỹ ETF first; for a quick on-site so sánh ETF Việt Nam screen across the full universe, use the công cụ so sánh ETF.

YTD 2026: the leader is the fund that lost the least

There is no positive YTD number anywhere in the table. The ranking, from best to worst, runs: FUESSV50 at -2.53%, FUEKIVFS at -4.98%, FUESSV30 at -6.32%, E1VFVN30 at -7.32%, FUESSVFL at -7.35%, VNM at -13.76%, and FUEVFVND at -14.88%. In other words, this year's "Vietnam ETF leader" is defined by relative drawdown, not by absolute gain. The spread between the best and the worst fund is 1,235 basis points — wide enough that fund selection mattered far more than timing the index this year.

FUESSV50 leads the YTD table — on the smallest decline

FUESSV50 (SSIAM VNX50 ETF) is the only fund in the set showing a YTD decline smaller than 5%, at -2.53%. Its shorter horizons are consistent with that position: +0.73% on the day, +0.69% over one week, and -2.84% over one month. The one-month figure is the second-best in the table, behind only FUESSVFL at -1.37%. The caveat sits in the volume column: 1K units, the thinnest turnover of any fund with a volume figure in this data set. The VNX50 exposure itself is different from a pure VN30 basket — see so sánh rổ chỉ số VN30 và VNX50 for how the two indices are constructed.

The VN30 group is clustered in the middle

Three funds in the table track VN30-family exposures: E1VFVN30 (VFMVN30 ETF) at -7.32% YTD, FUESSV30 (SSIAM VN30 ETF) at -6.32% YTD, and FUEKIVFS (KIM Growth VN30 ETF) at -4.98% YTD. The -4.98% to -7.32% band is only 234 basis points wide, even though E1VFVN30 trades at 305K units a day against 9K units for FUESSV30. Same index family, nearly the same performance, and completely different liquidity profiles — the spread here is a trading-cost story, not a stock-picking story.

VNM and FUEVFVND: the two laggards

VNM (VanEck Vietnam ETF) is the only USD-quoted fund in the set, at $16.48, down -13.76% YTD with 454K shares changing hands — the deepest volume in the table. FUEVFVND (DCVFMVN Diamond ETF) is the outright laggard at -14.88% YTD, and it is the only fund among the six domestic tickers where the one-week figure is positive (+0.46%) while the YTD figure is the worst in the set. In both cases, the gap to the leaders is larger than the entire spread between the seven domestic VN30/VNX50 funds.

Liquidity caveats: what a so sánh ETF Việt Nam table can hide

Performance numbers are only half of a comparison. Turnover in this data set ranges from 454K shares for VNM down to 1K units for FUESSV50 — a 454x difference. Thin turnover widens the bid-ask spread, makes large orders harder to fill without moving the price, and can make the daily percentage change in the table unrepresentative of the price you would actually get. FUEKIVFS is the clearest example: its +6.93% one-day move has no volume figure and no one-week figure attached, so neither the move nor its liquidity can be validated from this data set. Read rủi ro thanh khoản khi đầu tư ETF before treating any single-session move as tradeable.

Which Vietnam ETF is least risky in 2026?

"Least risky" is not the same as "best YTD". On the data above, FUESSV50 has the smallest drawdown (-2.53% YTD) and the best one-month figure among the leaders (-2.84%), but it also has the thinnest turnover (1K units). E1VFVN30 has the deepest turnover among the domestic funds (305K units) with a -7.32% YTD drawdown. VNM offers USD exposure and the deepest liquidity but carries currency risk on top of market risk. If your definition of risk is drawdown, the ranking is FUESSV50 first; if it is exit liquidity, E1VFVN30 and VNM come first. Track how these weightings shift in dòng tiền vào các quỹ ETF năm 2026.

Re-run this so sánh ETF Việt Nam comparison

All figures in this article are closing prices as of 16/10/2026 from Yahoo Finance and are not updated in real time. Re-run the screen on the công cụ so sánh ETF before making any decision, and check the latest diễn biến thị trường chứng khoán 2026 for context on the index moves behind these ETF returns.

Nội dung mang tính thông tin, không phải khuyến nghị đầu tư. Dữ liệu giá lấy từ Yahoo Finance tại thời điểm đóng cửa ngày 16/10/2026 và có thể đã thay đổi.