Loading live HOSE market data...
ETF Fund Flow
Back to Research & News
Analysis 6 min readOctober 6, 2026🇻🇳 Đọc bản tiếng Việt →

VN30 vs VN Diamond: Which Strategy Is ETF Money Flowing Into in Vietnam?

Executive Summary

E1VFVN30 is down 5.26% YTD versus -14.70% for FUEVFVND as of 05/10/2026 — and why trading volume is not the same as real ETF fund flow in Vietnam.

By:Sungsoo Na— COO & CCO at teko

VN30 vs VN Diamond: Which Strategy Is ETF Money Flowing Into in Vietnam?

Two of Vietnam's most closely followed domestic ETFs — the VFMVN30 ETF (E1VFVN30) and the DCVFMVN Diamond ETF (FUEVFVND) — are tracking two very different slices of the market, and their 2026 performance gap is widening. Per Yahoo Finance data as of 05/10/2026, E1VFVN30 carries a year-to-date return of -5.26% versus -14.70% for FUEVFVND, while the two funds recorded 273K units and 210K units of turnover respectively in the prior session. This article breaks down what that spread means for investors weighing a VN30 versus VN Diamond strategy — and why trading volume alone does not tell you where true fund money is moving.

VN30 and VN Diamond: Two Different Bets on Vietnam's Market

Although both ETFs are listed on Vietnamese exchanges and hold domestic equities, they follow fundamentally different index methodologies. Understanding that difference is the first step before comparing their returns or activity.

The VN30 approach — large-cap blue chips

The VN30 family tracks the 30 largest, most liquid companies on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange, weighted by market capitalisation with liquidity screens. E1VFVN30 and FUESSV30 (SSIAM VN30 ETF) are the two main trackers of this index, with E1VFVN30 being the larger and more actively traded of the pair. The strategy gives broad exposure to banks, real estate and consumer leaders — essentially a diversified core holding for Vietnam large-cap beta.

The VN Diamond approach — concentrated, foreign-room-driven

FUEVFVND tracks the VN Diamond index, which screens for listed companies that have reached, or are close to reaching, their foreign ownership limits — a structure that can create scarcity value in the shares. The result is a far more concentrated, higher-conviction portfolio. That concentration cuts both ways: it can amplify upside when the selected names perform, and it can deepen drawdowns when they do not.

Performance in October 2026: What the Data Shows

The table below summarises the prior-session closing data for Vietnam-focused ETFs, sourced from Yahoo Finance as of 05/10/2026. Because the market had not yet opened at the time of this data pull, all prices reflect the last recorded session close.

E1VFVN30 vs FUEVFVND head to head

The contrast across time horizons is instructive:

  • E1VFVN30: 34,050 VND, -0.09% on the day, -1.18% over one week, -3.42% over one month, and -5.26% year-to-date, on 273K units of volume.
  • FUEVFVND: 32,670 VND, +0.03% on the day, -1.12% over one week, -4.19% over one month, and -14.70% year-to-date, on 210K units of volume.

At the one-day and one-week horizons the two are nearly level — FUEVFVND actually edged ahead with a +0.03% daily move versus -0.09% for E1VFVN30, and the weekly gap is just 0.06 percentage points. The divergence is far more pronounced over the month and the year: the YTD gap of roughly 9.4 percentage points in favour of the VN30 strategy is the headline number, and it reflects how the concentrated Diamond portfolio has been the harder hit of the two in 2026.

The wider ETF lineup

It is worth placing both funds in context. SSIAM VN30 ETF (FUESSV30) closed at 23,960 VND with a -5.30% YTD return and only 11K units of volume, while SSIAM VNX50 ETF (FUESSV50) stood at 27,800 VND, -2.18% YTD and just 2K units. SSIAM VN FINLEAD ETF (FUESSVFL) was at 27,870 VND with -8.20% YTD. KIM Growth VN30 ETF (FUEKIVFS) closed at 16,210 VND with a +6.93% one-day move but -4.98% YTD and 0K units recorded, and the US-listed VanEck Vietnam ETF (VNM) traded at $16.89, +0.99% on the day and -11.64% YTD on 311K shares. The pattern is consistent: domestic large-cap and broad-market trackers have generally held up better than narrower, more concentrated strategies year-to-date.

"Money Flow" vs Trading Volume: A Crucial Distinction

The headline question — which strategy is ETF money flowing into — requires a definitional caveat that many market commentaries skip.

What actual fund flow measures

True ETF fund flow is the change in shares outstanding multiplied by net asset value. It is created by primary-market activity — authorised participants creating or redeeming shares — and it is reported separately from exchange trading. The data available in the table above does not include creation or redemption figures. It shows exchange turnover only.

What the volume data tells us

On that measure, in the prior session E1VFVN30 recorded 273K units and FUEVFVND 210K units. Based on trading data as of 05/10/2026, E1VFVN30 was the more actively traded of the two. That is a statement about secondary-market liquidity and investor attention — it is not evidence of net capital entering either fund. To be precise: this is trading volume, not confirmed fund inflow. Investors who want to track genuine flows should watch official share-outstanding and NAV disclosures rather than daily volume.

Tracking Error and Costs: What Long-Term Investors Should Watch

For anyone holding an ETF over months or years, the index return matters less than the return you actually capture. That gap is where tracking error and cost ratios come in.

Why tracking error matters here

Both a VN30 tracker and the VN Diamond tracker aim to replicate their benchmark, but concentration, foreign-room dynamics and rebalancing schedules can all influence how tightly a fund follows its index. A more concentrated index — like VN Diamond — typically demands more frequent rebalancing and can carry wider spreads in its underlying constituents, both of which can widen tracking error relative to a broad 30-stock benchmark. Investors comparing the two should review each fund's published tracking difference over rolling periods rather than relying on headline returns alone.

Cost as a structural factor

Management fees, custodial costs and transaction costs inside the fund all compound over time. Because a passively managed VN30 product and a rules-based Diamond product may differ in turnover, their internal cost drag can differ even if headline fee rates look similar. This is one reason a persistent, structural gap can open between two funds that both claim to be "passive."

How Investors Can Compare These ETFs

The practical takeaway from the 05/10/2026 data is that Vietnam's large-cap VN30 strategy (E1VFVN30, -5.26% YTD) has meaningfully outperformed the concentrated VN Diamond strategy (FUEVFVND, -14.70% YTD) so far in 2026, while both sit at similar price levels — 34,050 VND versus 32,670 VND — and both traded in comparable volume ranges in the prior session. That does not automatically make one "better"; it reflects two different mandates behaving as expected in a year when concentration has been a headwind.

Investors can review full product details, NAV and fee information on our ETF product hub, and dive into individual fund pages for E1VFVN30 and FUEVFVND. For side-by-side performance and cost comparisons, the ETF comparison tool lets you align timeframes, and the market section provides ongoing coverage of liquidity and listing activity across Vietnamese ETFs.

FAQ

What is the main difference between a VN30 ETF and the VN Diamond ETF?

A VN30 ETF tracks the 30 largest, most liquid stocks on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange, giving broad large-cap exposure. FUEVFVND tracks the VN Diamond index, which focuses on companies at or near their foreign ownership limits — a narrower, more concentrated portfolio.

Is trading volume the same as ETF fund flow?

No. Fund flow measures the change in shares outstanding multiplied by NAV, driven by creation and redemption activity in the primary market. Trading volume, like the 273K units for E1VFVN30 and 210K units for FUEVFVND in the prior session, reflects secondary-market exchange activity only and should not be described as capital inflow.

Which ETF has performed better year-to-date in 2026?

Based on Yahoo Finance data as of 05/10/2026, E1VFVN30 was down 5.26% year-to-date, while FUEVFVND was down 14.70% — a gap of roughly 9.4 percentage points in favour of the VN30 strategy over that period.

Explore Vietnam ETFs on etf.com.vn

Whether your focus is broad large-cap exposure through E1VFVN30 or a concentrated foreign-room strategy through FUEVFVND, etf.com.vn keeps fund-level data, comparison tools and market updates in one place. Start at our product hub, run a head-to-head using the comparison tool, and follow flow and liquidity developments in the market section.

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personal investment advice.

#ETF VN30#VN Diamond#ETF Vietnam#E1VFVN30#FUEVFVND

About the Author

Sungsoo Na

COO & CCO at teko

LinkedIn

Financial executive with over 18 years of experience across equity derivatives, structured products, tokenized securities, and fintech in South Korea, Hong Kong, and Vietnam. Former CEO of Vina Securities JSC (2020–2024) and former Institutional Equity Division executive at Morgan Stanley (2014–2019), holding a Ph.D. in Financial Engineering from North Carolina State University.

Full credentials & published research
Disclaimer: This content is provided for informational and market research purposes only and does not constitute personalized investment advice.

Track ETF Flows & Equity Constituents

Monitor live HOSE orderbook prices, VWAP spreads, and check which ETFs hold FPT, ACB, TCB, or HPG.

Related Research Articles