VN30 vs VN Diamond ETFs — So sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond: Where the Money Is Flowing and Who Tracks the Index Better?
As of the prior session's close on 16/09/2026, per Yahoo Finance data, the VFMVN30 ETF (E1VFVN30) traded 630K units while the DCVFMVN Diamond ETF (FUEVFVND) traded 79K units — the two most actively traded domestic equity ETFs on the board, yet their year-to-date returns sit far apart at -3.57% versus -11.49%. This analysis compares the two on prices, turnover and the dispersion between VN30-tracking funds, and explains why trading volume is not the same thing as fund flow, and why a published tracking error cannot be inferred from price data alone.
Tóm tắt so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond (phiên 16/09/2026): E1VFVN30 khớp 630K đơn vị, FUEVFVND khớp 79K đơn vị; lợi nhuận từ đầu năm (YTD) lần lượt là -3.57% và -11.49%. Phần dưới đây là bảng so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond theo giá, thanh khoản, lợi nhuận và những giới hạn của dữ liệu giá khi đánh giá tracking error.
Snapshot: Prices and Turnover at the Latest Close
The table below reflects the closing prices and traded volumes from the prior session (16/09/2026), published by Yahoo Finance. The market had not yet opened at the time of writing, so no intraday figure is included. For index background, see VN30 index là gì and VN Diamond index là gì.
| Ticker | Name | Price | 1-Day | 1-Week | 1-Month | YTD | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1VFVN30 | VFMVN30 ETF | 35,000 VND | -0.14% | -1.69% | +2.96% | -3.57% | 630K units |
| FUEVFVND | DCVFMVN Diamond ETF | 33,900 VND | +0.41% | +0.30% | +0.06% | -11.49% | 79K units |
| FUESSV30 | SSIAM VN30 ETF | 24,560 VND | -1.21% | -1.17% | +0.74% | -2.92% | 13K units |
| FUESSV50 | SSIAM VNX50 ETF | 28,510 VND | -2.23% | -4.65% | +4.17% | +0.28% | 3K units |
| FUESSVFL | SSIAM VN FINLEAD ETF | 28,520 VND | +0.84% | -1.00% | +1.06% | -5.63% | 8K units |
| FUEKIVFS | KIM Growth VN30 ETF | 17,230 VND | +0.76% | -1.54% | -0.40% | +1.00% | 0K units |
| VNM | VanEck Vietnam ETF | $17.34 | -0.37% | -2.83% | +1.14% | -9.24% | 240K shares |
Nguồn dữ liệu: Yahoo Finance, giá đóng cửa phiên 16/09/2026. Đơn giá tính bằng VND, riêng VNM niêm yết bằng USD.
E1VFVN30 leads the board on turnover
With 630K units changing hands in the reported session, E1VFVN30 recorded the highest turnover of any domestic ETF in the table. FUESSV30, the other pure VN30 tracker on the list, traded 13K units, and FUEKIVFS recorded 0K units — no units changed hands in the reported session, according to the data.
E1VFVN30's price stood at 35,000 VND, down 0.14% for the session and 1.69% over the week, but up 2.96% over the past month. Year-to-date the fund is down 3.57%. Note that unit volume is a measure of thanh khoản ETF on the exchange, not of net creation or redemption flow.
FUEVFVND: thinner turnover, different trajectory
FUEVFVND closed at 33,900 VND, up 0.41% on the day and up 0.30% over the week, essentially flat over the month at +0.06%. Its year-to-date figure of -11.49% is the weakest of the group shown. Turnover of 79K units was roughly one-eighth of the turnover recorded by E1VFVN30 — a level that is meaningful in absolute terms but thin relative to the VN30 leader. For the basket construction behind this fund, see FUEVFVND và danh mục Diamond.
Returns: What the Year-to-Date Numbers Say
Looking at YTD performance across the table, the three VN30-tracking vehicles show -3.57% (E1VFVN30), -2.92% (FUESSV30) and +1.00% (FUEKIVFS). The Diamond strategy, which follows a concentrated, foreign-room-constrained basket, shows -11.49%. That is the single widest gap in the dataset and the core of the VN30 versus Diamond comparison in 2026.
Shorter windows tell a different story
Over the past month, the ranking flips. E1VFVN30 is up 2.96%, FUESSV30 up 0.74%, FUEKIVFS down 0.40% and FUEVFVND up just 0.06%. Over the past week, FUEVFVND is the only fund in the group posting a positive figure for both the week (+0.30%) and the day (+0.41%), while E1VFVN30 is down 1.69% for the week.
The practical takeaway: a YTD gap of roughly 8 percentage points between E1VFVN30 (-3.57%) and FUEVFVND (-11.49%) is largely a statement about index composition — the Diamond basket's concentration and its foreign-room constraint — rather than about manager skill. Cost structure also differs between vehicles; see phí giao dịch ETF before drawing conclusions from short-window rankings.
So sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond: Volume Is Not Fund Flow
A common mistake in any so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond is to read 630K units as "money flowing into VN30" and 79K units as "money leaving Diamond". Traded volume measures secondary-market matching on the exchange, whereas fund flow is measured by the creation and redemption of fund certificates against NAV. The two can move in opposite directions on the same session, especially when a market maker is absorbing inventory or when a large investor is switching vehicles.
What the data does support is narrower: E1VFVN30 is the more liquid vehicle, which typically means tighter bid-ask spreads and easier execution for size. FUEVFVND's thinner tape means a large order is more likely to move the price. Investors weighing execution cost should also read hướng dẫn mua ETF and the note on ETF nước ngoài như VanEck VNM, which is not directly comparable in liquidity terms.
Tracking Error: What Price Data Can and Cannot Show
None of the figures above allow a ranking of tracking error. Tracking error is the standard deviation of the difference between fund NAV returns and index returns, calculated from NAV series — not from exchange prices. Exchange price diverges from NAV because of premiums and discounts, and a fund can trade at a premium while replicating its index almost perfectly.
A second caveat: with a single session of volume data, the dispersion between the three VN30-tracking funds (-3.57%, -2.92%, +1.00% YTD) may reflect differences in fee levels, dividend treatment, replication method or NAV timing rather than management quality. Published tracking error should be taken from fund factsheets, and any conclusion drawn from the table above should be labelled as inference, not fact. Definitions are covered in tracking error là gì.
So sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond: Which Vehicle Fits Which Investor?
Based on the data available:
- Liquidity first: E1VFVN30, with 630K units traded, is the default choice for investors who need to enter or exit size without slippage.
- Index exposure: VN30 trackers deliver diversified large-cap exposure; VN Diamond delivers a concentrated, foreign-room-constrained basket that has behaved very differently YTD (-11.49%).
- Sector tilt: see FUESSVFL và nhóm cổ phiếu tài chính for a different concentration trade.
- Flow and rate backdrop: the macro drivers behind ETF flows are covered in lãi suất và dòng tiền 2026.
FAQ: So sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond
Which fund traded more on 16/09/2026?
E1VFVN30 traded 630K units versus 79K units for FUEVFVND, according to Yahoo Finance data for the prior session.
Does higher volume mean more money flowing in?
No. Volume is secondary-market turnover. Fund flow is measured through creation and redemption activity against NAV, which is published separately by the fund company.
Can tracking error be compared from the table above?
No. Tracking error requires NAV return series; exchange prices include premiums and discounts and cannot substitute for them.
Conclusion: So sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond in 2026
On the latest session, E1VFVN30 was the more liquid vehicle (630K units) and the better year-to-date performer (-3.57%), while FUEVFVND lagged at -11.49% on 79K units. The so sánh ETF VN30 và VN Diamond is therefore less about which fund "tracks better" and more about which index exposure an investor wants — and about reading the right metric for the question being asked.
Dữ liệu trong bài chỉ mang tính tham khảo, không phải khuyến nghị đầu tư. Giá và khối lượng thay đổi theo từng phiên; nhà đầu tư nên kiểm tra factsheet của quỹ trước khi ra quyết định.